Select.Bet Casino Review

Select.bet are Not Recommended at ThePOGG for the reasons listed below - some come as a result of actions taken by sister properties. Select.bet have chosen not to discuss complaints with our disputes service.

Predatory Dormancy Clause - automatic Not Recommended - Term 3.16 states: 3.16. Accounts with no activity recorded for 6 months are considered inactive. Should an account be inactive for 6 months or longer (no deposit and betting / gaming activity), Select.bet reserves all rights to terminate the customer account and thus; All outstanding amounts will be forfeited. Please contact us by email at [email protected] or with the live chat function for general questions about your inactive account and your excellent balance. All restored accounts will have their outstanding balances restored. " 22/1/2021 A period of inactivity should never be used as an excuse to seize account balances.

Maximum Withdrawal Does Not Exclude Progressive Jackpots: " The time it takes to successfully complete a withdrawal may vary due to different circumstances, however an attempt to withdraw should be approved or rejected within two (2) days. A player will be informed of the reasons for a delay if the time within which the money is received in the player account exceeds ten (10) days, if you wish to withdraw part of the profit, the 10,000 EUR (or the equivalent in another currency selected during registration) or more, we are entitled to divide the payment in installments. until the full amount is paid. Outstanding amounts do not accrue interest. " 22/1/2021 Since jackpot funds come either from an existing central pool controlled by the casino if they are local jackpots, or from the games provider if non-local, there should be no reason why funds cannot be paid out in one go after the win has been verified. This is predatory.

Further to this, their sister property,18 Bet casino previously held our Deposit Guarantee Seal. The very first player that we sent to them use the Martingale betting system when playing Roulette. The casino then used a term that prohibited 'non-recreational' play without defining what 'non-recreational' meant to justify voiding the player's winnings. This directly violates the agreement that they'd entered into with this site and as such they have lost the Deposit Guarantee Seal and been moved to Not Recommended status.

Another case against this group of operators saw the operator refuse payment to a player based on multi-accounting, with what we feel to be insufficient evidence.,

For references see Bellona N.V. Player Issues