Android Phone

iPad

iPhone

Windows

British Pound Sterling

Habanero

Merkur

Gibraltar

UKGC

LadyLucks Casino

Maestro

Master Card

Paypal

Paysafecard

Solo

VISA

Visa Debit

Visa Electron

Chat

Email

Hi icnusa - welcome to ThePOGG.com!

Before we go any further, you state that "I selfexcluded myself years ago in both sites" - I need to you to confirm when you Self-Excluded and you state that you did so at BOTH sites, did you submit a request individually to each site?

Thanks,

ThePOGG

Hi there, i have self-excluded myself in both sites years ago, unfortunately, i do not have the email but the previous company must have it . what struck me is they didn't even consider all the self-excluded people left behind and neither of the companies advice the players about the changes

Hi icnusa,

You've used the same phrasing as you did in your initial submission and I'm afraid this doesn't answer my question.

Did you Self-Exclude at each casino individually?

SlotsMillion previously ran on a different license and were owned by a different group than LadyLucks, who were owned by the IGT group. A Self-Exclusion at LadyLucks would only apply on the IGT license where it was initiated. IGT sold the LadyLuck website/platform to the SlotsMillion group. They did not sell their player database. As such there's no way that SlotsMillion would be aware of your Self-Exclusion. Your Self-Exclusion on the IGT license should still be in place and would not transfer over to the SlotsMillion license. We've already confirmed this to be accurate and not in breach of license with the UKGC.

If you've previously Self-Excluded at SlotsMillion you may, depending on when you excluded, have a case.

Thank,

ThePOGG

Hi there , 
thanks for your reply .

I did indeed selfexcluded in both sites as for many years i couldnt reopen the account .
I was not even aware that the sites were sister now and didnt know by then what licence they were under tbh.

Hi icnusa,

Can you please provide your user details for BOTH sites.

Thanks,

ThePOGG

Hi icnusa,

I'm following up on the above?

Thanks,

ThePOGG

Hi there , i did self-exclude myself years ago in both sites , i asked both casinos to check themselves s too much time has pass by and i do not keep old emails but their system should have had my info and they told me the company was bought and they did not buy the old clients database so they are not responsible  for old vulnerable players. So easy for them to get new clients with selfexclusion problems as they are usuallly the one who spend most due their illness . I feel this move is unacceptable as we are not furniure that u forget once  buy your new flat , we are people and if i was selfexcluded i should have recieve an email saying that this compnay was bouhgt and it would have been my choice then.
I hope this makes sense .

Thanks for your help

Hi icnusa,

Unfortunately we cannot agree with the statement you've made above.

When you Self-Excluded at Lady Lucks your account was with the IGT license. That account remains with the IGT license. It has not been passed over in the sale and despite the url being the same you would not be able to log into the current incarnation of Lady Lucks to play. You would have had to sign-up an entirely new account to regain access to Lady Lucks and the current owners would not have been aware of any previous account you had on the previous license.

If you Self-Excluded previously at Slots Millions, while they've been under the UKGC license, then that exclusion would apply to both properties. But we will need to gather supporting evidence for that from the operator if you cannot provide that yourself.

I will revert to you once I've discussed this issue with the operator.

Thanks,

ThePOGG

Thanks for your reply.

What i would like to know is why vulnerabe players were not considered in the transaction and from the seller side an email wasnt sent to let clients know about the transaction?
I am not the only one in this position an di think the gambling commission should have imposed to IGT to let their clients know about the trasaction. I will try to conact IGT and see if they can help to provide the dates of my selfexclsuion and will get back to you .

thanks for your time in and help .
Regards
incusa

Is there any chance you can hep me to find a contact from IGT as im finding hard to find one?

Hi icnusa,

The date of the IGT Self-Exclusion is NOT relevant. This has no bearing under the SlotsMillions license.

Vulnerable players were not forgotten. You excluded with the IGT license. That exclusion should still be in place with any property they control. An exclusion under the IGT license would NEVER have applied to SlotsMillions as they are different companies. When the Lady Luck's website was sold your account was not transferred with the sale. SlotsMillions did NOT buy the player accounts as part of the sale. They would have no information related to your previous account with Lady Lucks. The only way you could access Lady Lucks after this point would have been by registering another account. 

<strong><u>If</u></strong> you had a Self-Exclusion in place at SlotsMillions you should not have been able to open an account with Lady Lucks after the sale. So the issue here really has nothing to do with whether you'd Self-Excluded at Lady Lucks. It all ties in to when/whether you Self-Excluded with SlotsMillions.

Thanks,

ThePOGG

Our views on this case have been supported by the Gambling Commission. This is unfortunate but not in breach of license.

Slottsmillion and ladylucks are accepting selfexcluded players.
 
 I selfexcluded myself years ago in both sites and now in September the companies got sold to another licence holder.
 
 When i ask for a refund they sais the company didnt buy the database so they have to obbligations toward the vulnerabe players as is a new company.
 
 I feel is very unfair that between the transaction they forgot about self-excluded players who reached out to be selfexcluded and when the company got sold noone was adviced in order for the players to know it was another company,
 
 i would like you to let the gambling comission know that they accepting selfexcluded players .
 
 Is not cool , we are not chairs that u forget behind when u buy a new flat
 
 We are people and selfexcluded players should have been considered in the picture when they bough they new casinos.
 
 Could u pls advice me on what to do and prevent other players to decieved again?
 
 Thanks a million.
 
 Best regards
 
 [EDIT]

Ladylucks - accepting selfexcluded

To submit an online gambling complaint, register a new account or log in.

Create account

Log in

Got a complaint about a gambling site?

Casino Review Site Logo

Log out

Account

Title

Complaint Details

Posted By

Disputed amount

Date raised

Date closed

Player’s Complaint

To protect the privacy of our users, all personally identifiable information has been redacted. If you see anything we've missed contact us at complaints@casinoreviews.com.

Player's Complaint

Player Complaint Responses

Complaint Title

This complaint may have been archived. If you are looking for information about your complaint, please contact us at complaints@casinoreviews.com

This link is no longer valid

Dynamic Single Complaint 

Default

IGT DE

All British Casino UK

Playtech ZA

Bank Transfer CA

Online Casinos UK

Cookie Policy DE

PayPal

Neteller UK

Spin Casino

ecoPayz IE

King Billy Casino CA

Free Spins IN

Casinos en vivo PE

Terms of Use DE

Mirax Casino CA

Oasis Poker

Hellspin Casino NZ

Roulette ZA

Rizk Casino IE

Bonos de Casino

ecoPayz UK

Live Casinos AT

IGT NZ

Yabby Casino IE

Casinos Online CL

Condiciones de uso MX

Dave Ellefson - Founding member of Megadeth

African Grand ZA

GrandWin Casino

Mirax 

Bank Transfer ZA

Guts Casino CA

Ken Smith Blackjack Tournament Expert

Diamond7 Casino 

Casino Games IN

Visa CA

bCasino.co.uk – A UK licensed operator with ties to the black market?

New Casinos IN

21Prive Casino

Queen Vegas NZ

All Complaints

Visa ZA

King Billy Casino

Skrill CA

PayPal NZ

500 Deposit NZ

32Red Casino

Paysafecard DE

Responsible Gambling IN

Casino War

21Red Casino

Game Providers UK

Qbet Casino

ecoPayz CH

Quickfire

Zahlungsmethoden CH

Ruleta CO

Betway Casino NZ

888 Casino

PayPal IE

Arctic Casino NZ

JackpotCity Casino Ontario

Responsible Gambling UK

Aristocrat

Microgaming DE

888 Casino CA

Grosvenor Casino

100 Deposit NZ

Online Casinos IE

Mirax NZ

Starda Casino IN

Casumo Casino Ontario

Bank Transfer IN

Wazamba Casino CA

Betsson CO

Baccarat CA

Vegas Crest NZ

Red Stag Casino IE

Live Casinos NZ

Casumo Casino NZ

KingdomAce Casino

Mobile Casinos

CasinoLuck

Dinero real

Blackjack MX

Playtech DE

Visa IN

SlotsMagic Casino NZ

Bizzo Casino CL

Craps UK

Boku ZA

WSM Casino CA

888 Casino Ontario

Slots UK

Cobra Casino NZ

JackpotCity Casino IE

Cobber Casino AT

Política de privacidad MX

Whistleblowing Policy

Baccarat IE

Casino4u AT

Juegos de Casino CO

Casino Classic NZ

Casino Bonus AT

VIP Casinos CH

Contacta con nosotros CL

Ultra Casino NZ

Royal Panda Casino

Bally ZA

Wildz Casino Ontario

Neue Casinos DE

Bitcoin AT

Best Payout casinos NZ

Dinero real MX

Jackpot Village Casino

Villento Casino

Wazamba Casino

Zaza Casino

Interac 

Playtech CA

Fresh Casino

Casino Games ZA

Spielautomaten CH

Fresh Casino IN

Quickfire NZ

Izzi Casino CA

LuckyWins NZ

Beste Auszahlungen in Casinos DE

Euro Palace Casino NZ

Ladbrokes Casino

Spielautomaten AT

Payment Methods

IGT IN

Neteller

SpinBetter Casino NZ

Bally CH

Aristocrat UK

Bank Transfer

New Casinos UK

Locowin Casino CA

Guides

Roulette CH

Fresh Casino PE

PlayNGo DE