Android Phone

iPad

iPhone

Windows

Australian Dollar

Euro

British Pound Sterling

Microgaming

Lucky247 Casino

Euteller

Ewire

Ideal

Instadebit

Maestro

Master Card

Neteller

Paysafecard

Poli

Skrill

Solo

Ukash

VISA

Visa Electron

Chat

Email

Phone

Skype

Hi boeddhamonster - thanks for getting in contact.

Before I can do anything about this I need you to provide me with the username and email address you use with Lucky 247.

After I have those I'll contact Lucky 247 and see what I can find out.

Thanks

ThePOGG

Hi boeddhamonster,

Just to keep you informed, I am now discussing this issue with Lucky 247 and hope to have some relevant information for you soon.

Thanks

ThePOGG

Hi boeddhamonster,

I have had a brief discussion with Lucky 247 about this issue, though I would stress that I'm yet to get all the details. The person in charge of the issue was out of the office at the end of last week and I'm hoping that they'll return sometime this week. Bear with me while I get all the information.

Thanks

ThePOGG

Hi boeddhamonster,

I've heard from the member of management dealing with this issue and they've sent their apologies as they meant to deal with this before they left for holiday.

It's going to take a few weeks to resolve this, but I'm confident that this issue can be resolved. Please bear with me while the relevant team member returns.

Thanks

ThePOGG

Hi boeddhamonster,

Here's the situation as it stands; The betting pattern that you chose (firstly betting high until you had a substantial win, then reducing your bets to conserve the win while you ground out the rest of the wagering requirement) has for a long time now been associated with Advantage Play which for obvious reasons casinos don't like. 

As Lucky 247 didn't have terms specifically prohibiting this style of play at the time you accepted the bonus, they have agreed to pay you in this instance and update their terms to ensure this playing style cannot be used in the future.

If this was simply an unfortunate coincidence rather than an intended strategy, I would advise you to alter your playing style in the future as this betting pattern will lead you to further issues with other venues. If this was an informed decision, you'll be well aware of the risks of implementing this betting strategy and I would highlight that with a less reputable venue a positive outcome would be far less likely.

Once again I would like to stress how open and cooperative Lucky 247 were when discussing this complaint. If every casino were as willing to listen to constructive criticism, online gambling would be a far safer passtime.

ThePOGG

Hi boeddhamonster,

One thing that I forgot to mention yesterday, I will hold this complaint open until you confirm receipt of your funds, so I'd appreciate it if you could let me know when that happens.

Thanks

ThePOGG

Hi boeddhamonster,

I confirmed that Lucky 247 were going to issue payment to you on the 1st of April. It's now the 7th. Can you confirm that you have received your funds? If no response is forthcoming  I will assume that you have received your funds and close this complaint on Friday the 11th of April.

Thanks.

ThePOGG

boeddhamonster has confirmed that they have now received the full payment from Lucky 247.

Hello the POGG

The casino have pay my win. I am so happy and want thank you so so much for doing so good in helping me. You are the best:):)

Hi boeddhamonster,

Thanks for the conformation - it's appreciated.

I'm going to hold this complaint open for a couple more days while I resolve another issue with Lucky 247.

If there's anything I can help you with in the future, don't hesitate to get in contact.

ThePOGG

I’ve specifically been holding off on the publication of 3 complaints about Lucky247 until the last of them was resolved and I have to admit I’m very concerned that these cases were not the honest players that the individuals submitting them would represent.

All 3 complaints revolved around confiscation of funds due to vague justifications of “bonus abuse”. That’s not a problem, after extended discussion with Lucky247, they agreed that their terms were not clear enough and relevant adjustments have been made.

What does concern me is that 3 complaints of the same nature where submitted to ThePOGG.com in a relatively short space of time. Given that ThePOGG.com is the smallest of several choices players have for dispute mediation against casinos this leaves 4 possibilities;

1) Lucky247 had been widely enforcing vague terms very recently on a large number of players (a large sample would obviously make it more likely that several players may end up here).

2) Players experiencing similar issues submitted complaints after seeing the resolution of the first complaint.

3) After the first complaint was submitted and appeared to be moving to a positive conclusion, further players directly associated with the original complaint submitted complaints.

4) Coincidence.

I can rule out options 1 and 2. I know exactly how many confiscations were made with these vague rules and these 3 complaints represented the majority of them (i.e. the sample size simply isn’t large enough for it to be likely that 3 separate player selected ThePOGG by chance).

Alongside this I’ve looked at my competitor sites and no other similar complaints turned up anywhere else, providing further evidence that this was not a widespread practice at this casino.

I also refrained from publishing any of the three complaints until now, so no-one other than the first complaint submitter would know that the first complaint was resolved.

This only leaves options 3 and 4.

Coincidence seems very unlikely which that leaves an undefined association between the accounts in these three cases the likely connecting factor. Add to this that the player in the original complainant was informed on the 1st of April that they would be paid and complaints 2 and 3 came in hot on the heels of this decision on the 8th and 16th of April and I feel that the likelihood of these players not being associated becomes very slim.

If these accounts are not being run by the same individual under different names, I feel it’s highly likely that the players operating the accounts have a personal relationship with each other that has specifically not been disclosed to this site at the time they submitted their complaint.

While the original justification for the seizures of funds were obviously not valid, collusion or multi-accounting is an absolutely valid justification for non-payment of winnings and in these cases there is – to my mind – a fairly strong indication that this has been taking place. If you choose to engage in this type of practice that’s your choice, but my service is not here to assist you.

From this point on situations where I find suspicious associations between complaints are likely to be held against the submitting players. I will do my best to ensure that coincidental factors are ruled out but had I been aware of all of the facts prior to dealing with these complaints my recommendations to the casino would likely have been different.

I will say that this is the first instance where I’ve felt the need to question the relationship between different complaints, so this is not a common issue to have arisen.

You can view the other two complaints here ;

http://thepogg.com/complaint/lucky-247-funds-confiscated-for-lowering-bet-size-despite-no-prohibitive-terms/

http://thepogg.com/complaint/lucky-247-confiscated-my-winnings/

ThePOGG

Lucky247 ultimately paid the player but due to several connecting factors between this complaint as 2 others, this may be the wrong result.

Hello,
 
 I make a win on lucky 247 but i get email say
 
 We contact you with regards to your recent withdrawal.
 
 Kindly be advised that upon review of your casino account we found you to be in violation of term and condition no.14 which states:
 
 “All Players’ wagers will be reviewed for irregular game play patterns prior to any withdrawal being processed. Equal, zero, low margin or hedge betting will be construed as irregular game play for bonus wagering requirements. This also includes and is not limited to the placing of bets equal to or greater than 20% of the bonus credited to the players gaming account. Should the Casino deem that any irregular game play has taken place on the gaming account, the Casino reserves the right to withhold any cashin as well as the right to confiscate all winnings.”
 
 It is in this regard that your withdrawal of €2472.08 will be  confiscated of which €200 deposit and €200 bonus will be returned to your gaming account to allow you to play again.
 
 It not say what i do. I not do more then 20% from my bonus an I not know what is irregular game play. I not believe an not know what i can do. Can please help me?

Lucky 247 - casino not want pay my win

To submit an online gambling complaint, register a new account or log in.

Create account

Log in

Got a complaint about a gambling site?

Casino Review Site Logo

Log out

Account

Title

Complaint Details

Posted By

Disputed amount

Date raised

Date closed

Player’s Complaint

To protect the privacy of our users, all personally identifiable information has been redacted. If you see anything we've missed contact us at complaints@casinoreviews.com.

Player's Complaint

Player Complaint Responses

Complaint Title

This complaint may have been archived. If you are looking for information about your complaint, please contact us at complaints@casinoreviews.com

This link is no longer valid

Dynamic Single Complaint 

Default

IGT DE

All British Casino UK

Playtech ZA

Bank Transfer CA

Online Casinos UK

Cookie Policy DE

PayPal

Neteller UK

Spin Casino

ecoPayz IE

King Billy Casino CA

Free Spins IN

Casinos en vivo PE

Terms of Use DE

Mirax Casino CA

Oasis Poker

Hellspin Casino NZ

Roulette ZA

Rizk Casino IE

Bonos de Casino

ecoPayz UK

Live Casinos AT

IGT NZ

Yabby Casino IE

Casinos Online CL

Condiciones de uso MX

Dave Ellefson - Founding member of Megadeth

African Grand ZA

GrandWin Casino

Mirax 

Bank Transfer ZA

Guts Casino CA

Ken Smith Blackjack Tournament Expert

Diamond7 Casino 

Casino Games IN

Visa CA

bCasino.co.uk – A UK licensed operator with ties to the black market?

New Casinos IN

21Prive Casino

Queen Vegas NZ

All Complaints

Visa ZA

King Billy Casino

Skrill CA

PayPal NZ

500 Deposit NZ

32Red Casino

Paysafecard DE

Responsible Gambling IN

Casino War

21Red Casino

Game Providers UK

Qbet Casino

ecoPayz CH

Quickfire

Zahlungsmethoden CH

Ruleta CO

Betway Casino NZ

888 Casino

PayPal IE

Arctic Casino NZ

JackpotCity Casino Ontario

Responsible Gambling UK

Aristocrat

Microgaming DE

888 Casino CA

Grosvenor Casino

100 Deposit NZ

Online Casinos IE

Mirax NZ

Starda Casino IN

Casumo Casino Ontario

Bank Transfer IN

Wazamba Casino CA

Betsson CO

Baccarat CA

Vegas Crest NZ

Red Stag Casino IE

Live Casinos NZ

Casumo Casino NZ

KingdomAce Casino

Mobile Casinos

CasinoLuck

Dinero real

Blackjack MX

Playtech DE

Visa IN

SlotsMagic Casino NZ

Bizzo Casino CL

Craps UK

Boku ZA

WSM Casino CA

888 Casino Ontario

Slots UK

Cobra Casino NZ

JackpotCity Casino IE

Cobber Casino AT

Política de privacidad MX

Whistleblowing Policy

Baccarat IE

Casino4u AT

Juegos de Casino CO

Casino Classic NZ

Casino Bonus AT

VIP Casinos CH

Contacta con nosotros CL

Ultra Casino NZ

Royal Panda Casino

Bally ZA

Wildz Casino Ontario

Neue Casinos DE

Bitcoin AT

Best Payout casinos NZ

Dinero real MX

Jackpot Village Casino

Villento Casino

Wazamba Casino

Zaza Casino

Interac 

Playtech CA

Fresh Casino

Casino Games ZA

Spielautomaten CH

Fresh Casino IN

Quickfire NZ

Izzi Casino CA

LuckyWins NZ

Beste Auszahlungen in Casinos DE

Euro Palace Casino NZ

Ladbrokes Casino

Spielautomaten AT

Payment Methods

IGT IN

SpinBetter Casino NZ

Bally CH

Aristocrat UK

Bank Transfer