Slot Hunter - refuses to withdraw $30000
Ruling
Resolved - The submitting complainant has become non-responsive to our repeated requests for additional information. As such we assume they have resolved their issue on their own.
Read our Slot Hunter Casino Review.
Player's Complaint
On July 19, I made a $2500 deposit at slothunter.com, after which I won $28193 in a NetEnt slot, and my final balance was $30693. It should be noted that I played without using any promotions. I requested a withdrawal, and that’s when the problems began.
1. In order to withdraw my funds, I was asked for account verification: identity confirmation (passport or driver's license), address confirmation and a screenshot of my Skrill account, where the user ID and email are shown. When my documents were checked, I requested a withdrawal. It was rejected because in the bank statement that I uploaded to confirm the address, the date of issue was written by hand, although in all banks of the Republic of Belarus the date is written, not printed.
2. I had to upload a new address confirmation and request a new withdrawal, which was also canceled. In the live chat, I was told that I also needed to upload a proof of income.
3. I provided a bank statement for the dividend payments for 2021 in the amount of $204,674.89 (that type of statement can only be issued for the past calendar year). The document was rejected with reference to the fact that they can only accept a document that states income for the last six months. It turns out that if dividends were the only source of my income, I would not be able to withdraw my winnings, considering the fact that the profit on them is almost 82 times greater than the initial deposit?
4. Then I sent a certificate of salary, which indicated my average monthly income for the last year, which is $16190 at the current exchange rate, and asked in the live chat if I can now withdraw my funds. I was told that they would now approve my withdrawal.
5. I requested a new one, but it was rejected again and they said that I also needed to upload a Skrill statement for the last six months and a selfie with a proof of identity! I absolutely do not understand the request for such a large number of documents and what does the information about the movement of funds on my PERSONAL account have to do with account verification.
6. I sent those documents as well, and this time I got a response that their finance department is asking for another pay slip in the last 6 months(THE THIRD PROOF OF INCOME) as well as an explanation of some of my Skrill transactions! This is simply outrageous!
7. I can't take it anymore. I will not send them new documents, I will only send them to you if you consider it really necessary.
I can’t get rid of the feeling that the casino is trying to find a reason not to pay me my money, or this is their way to deliberately complicate the withdrawal process.
I have played and won in many online casinos with a MGA license, but this is the first time I encountered this behavior. Therefore, I want to complain about the casino and find answeres to the following questions:
Is it legal to require all of the above documents? I am especially interested in the legality of the requirement to provide information about the movement of funds on a personal account and a selfie.
Where can I find information regarding the documents that the casino is entitled to require?
Is the request for such a large number of documents an initiative of the casino or a requirement of the licensor?
Read
the casino review
6 Responses
Leave a Reply
You must be
logged in
to post a comment.
Hi processio - welcome to ThePOGG.com!
Please ensure you have read our Complaint Guidance to ensure that you fully understand how our complaint management process functions.
As we are the ADR for the N1 Interactive Ltd license under the Malta Gaming Authority license there is certain information we have to provide you now.
You can find all the relevant information about this service here – http://thepogg.com/terms-of-use/ and the terms of use for our complaint service here - https://thepogg.com/terms-of-use-for-dispute-resolution-service/
To summarise.
– Use of this service does not preclude your seeking redress through court proceedings .
– This service is free to use for both the complainant and operator.
– At any point during the procedure the submitting party retains the right to withdraw their complaint. This does not preclude our right to continue the discussion with the involved operator of general issues related to the complaint (i.e. insufficiently clear terms and conditions).
– You are not obliged to obtain independent or legal advice or representation, though you may choose to do so.
To put this matter into some context:
- You have made what would be considered a very large deposit.
- You are submitting a request for a very large withdrawal.
- You have submitted documents during the verification process that are non-standard in nature and appear to have had sections hand written, raising questions about their authenticity.
- You are resident in a jurisdiction that is currently subject to significant international sanctions.
Even without speaking to the operator we can state with certainty that each of the above factors individually would be considered a risk marker. When taken in conjunction there is no question that the operator legally required to conduct full and enhanced due diligence before processing the requested transaction. This is not a license issue. This is a matter of the laws in place to prevent money laundering, fraud and the funding of crime/terrorism that all sectors processing financial transactions are required to abide by.
The above is not an indication of a belief that you are engaged in any wrongdoing, but in the circumstances the responsible individuals withing the operator's business can end up facing jail sentences if they do not ensure that they have conducted these checks.
With regard to "the movement of funds on a personal account" and the requirement to provide selfies with ID - these are entirely legitimate and standard requests during these types of checks.
Please provide the rest of the documentation that the operator has requested and let us know once you have done so.
Thanks,
ThePOGG