Wishmaker - MT Secure Trade doesn't follow Responsible Gaming rules (permanent Self Exclusion)
Ruling
Found for the Casino - The player self-excluded on the BetIt license not the MT SecureTrade license. As such the self-exclusion would not carry over.
Read our Wishmaker Casino review.
Player's Complaint
Hello!
I asked thrills.com to self exclude me permanently from every MT Secure Trade casinos (I have an email to proof this). At the time (2019), thrills.com operated under MT Secure Trade (I Have email to proof this too). However, I was able to open wishmaker.com account and lose 165 (+99e deposit fees) there. I asked them for a refund, as I shouldn't have been able to play there at all (no withdrawals was made during play). However, they refused - and to top it all of, they try to lie that I hadn't been self excluded at the time of opening the account. I can send you every relevant CHAT transcript.
First, I would've been satisfied in just getting the original 165€ back. As they started lying and stalling (no emails were send to me until I contacted their chat), I wan't the full 265€ back. Also, as they are directly lying and not following responsible gaming rules, I strongly suggest for MT Secure Trade to lose their MGA License.
Where do I send the CHAT transcripts?
Read
the casino review
3 Responses
Leave a Reply
You must be
logged in
to post a comment.
Hi manttih - welcome to ThePOGG.com!
As we are the ADR for the MT Secure Trade license under the Malta Gaming Authority license there is certain information we have to provide you now.
You can find all the relevant information about this service here – http://thepogg.com/terms-of-use/ and the terms of use for our complaint service here - https://thepogg.com/terms-of-use-for-dispute-resolution-service/
To summarise.
– Use of this service does not preclude your seeking redress through court proceedings .
– This service is free to use for both the complainant and operator.
– At any point during the procedure the submitting party retains the right to withdraw their complaint. This does not preclude our right to continue the discussion with the involved operator of general issues related to the complaint (i.e. insufficiently clear terms and conditions).
– You are not obliged to obtain independent or legal advice or representation, though you may choose to do so.
If you have any questions about the above, let me know.
I'll contact the operator and find out.
Thanks,
ThePOGG