unclaimed offers
Turn geolocation on
Locale settings

Currently viewing:

English in United Kingdom

ThePOGG.com – your source for reliable information about online gambling.

  • Over 2k complaints managed and $2 million returned to players.
  • The largest collection of detailed casino reviews available online.
  • Bonus value reports to tell you how bonuses really compare.
  • Detailed game guides to help you learn to play.

I certify that I am over 18 years of age and I have read and agreed to the:

We respect your privacy and won't share your email address.
[X] Close this form and return to site

Moore Games – Changed allowed games 4 days after a great win of 24k.


There is strong evidence to suggest that Moore Games changed the rules of their welcome bonus AFTER the player completed the bonus to try and justify not paying the player. They have subsequently stopped communicating with us and have now shut their site down and do not appear to be paying any players.

Read our Moore Games Review.

Player's Complaint

The story is:

I've made my registration and my deposit at 17/04/2013.

After playing according their terms of bonus and completing much more of the wagering requirements i had 24.000 euro balance.

After 2 days i noticed that my account had 0 balance, and ask the support team.

They answer that i had play not allowed games for this reason my account will 0.

I am sure that i had play on allowed games, such as Hitman , thunderstack slots and then after checking their site they had removed these games.

They changed their site and removed these specific slots at 22/04/2013, and after they sent the email to me.

I replied to reconsider their decision but no answer until now.

Please help me to receive my winnings and protect other players.

Here is their email:

Dear Granti56,

Please note that your withdrawal request has been declined due to not fulfilling the wagering requirements!

By the time of the withdrawal, you reached a total rollover of 12.240 Euro on valid Casino games. For this reason, your funds have been returned to your player account until the wagering was finished.

By the time of the withdrawal, you played another 6.975 Euro on other Casino games which are not considered valid for the wagering requirement of this bonus. So, indeed you wagered more than 16.000 Euro in Casino, but unfortunately not all games were considered valid for the rollover.

Read the casino review

16 Responses

Apr 26, 2013

Hi Granti56 - thanks for getting in contact.

I'll contact Moore Games just now and see what I can find out. Please bare in mind that as this is already Friday afternoon, I'm unlikely to receive a response before next week.


Apr 26, 2013

Also I'll need your username and the email address you use at Moore Games before I contact them.



Apr 26, 2013

Thank you.
My username is [EDIT]
My email is [EDIT]
Also my deposit was 200 euro and the bonus was 200 euro with wager requirements 16000

Apr 26, 2013

Hi Granti56,

Can you confirm for me that you played Hitman?


Apr 29, 2013

Yes i played Hitman, and Tomb Raider and Thunderstruck.
These are the games they removed.

Apr 29, 2013

I check now again the terms and they removed also the slot Secret Admirer , which was the first slot i had play during my game play.

Apr 29, 2013

Thanks for that Granti56 - let me speak to Moore Games and see what happens. Did you take a screen shot of the terms and conditions at the time you signed up?


Apr 29, 2013

No i didn,t did this, but at your site you can find the terms before changed (http://thepogg.com/casino-review/moore-games/) and of course check this link, is from google cache which is from 13/04.


Thanks for your help again.

Apr 29, 2013

Hi Granti56,

I had already spotted the difference in terms from those we listed in our update in Feb, but the terms could have changed at any point between then and now. The google cache however really narrows the field.

I have edited your post slightly - I understand your frustration, but for the time being lets not throw accusations around.


Apr 29, 2013

Hi Granti56,

I have deleted your last post as it makes similar accusations to my previous edit that currently the evidence does not substantiate.

All I can confirm at the current time is that 4 days before you signed up the terms definitely did allow the games you played.

Please allow me time to liaise with Moore Games and get their side of the story.


May 04, 2013

Hi Granti56,

I have tried to contact Moore Games a couple of times this week regarding this issue with no success. I'm going to extend this complaint for another week - it's possible that my contact has been off sick or there is some other issue - as I'd like to continue working on this as long as I feel a resolution may be possible.



May 10, 2013

Thanks for the help.
Do we have any news from them?

May 11, 2013

Sorry about the delay Granti56 - I was away from the computer for most of the day yesterday.

Unfortunately I have not heard anything back from Moore Games at this point. I've emailed them around an hour ago to inform them that if I've not heard back from them by Tuesday I will be publishing a report reflecting the nature of this complaint.

Hopefully this will get them moving, but I wouldn't count on it at this stage.


May 14, 2013

Ok Moore Games have had more than enough time to respond to this complaint, or even make any reasonable effort. They haven’t. As such, I’m closing this complaint as Found for the Player.

Worse than not responding to this complaint, I’ve come to believe that Moore Games did in fact change their list of allowed game after Granti56 hit their win. There are several factors that have influenced this conclusion which I’ll go through below.

Firstly Granti56 claims to have played some of the best online slots: Hitman, Tomb Raider, Secret Admirer and Thunderstruck all of which are big name Microgaming titles. During our last review update in February 2013, all four of these games were on the allowed list. Checking against the current list, of the original 88 game present on the list in February 2013 4 have been removed – Hitman, Tomb Raider, Secret Admirer and Thunderstruck.

Further to this, when we checked the Google cache on the specific promotion page, we can confirm – as will the video below – that on the 13th of April 2013, all of these games were still on the allowed list;

Granti56 claims to have played on the 17th of April. This means that for Moore Games to be right and Granti56 to have played a disallowed game, they would have to have altered the allowed games sometime between the 13th and the 17th of April 2013. There are only three possible way in which Granti56 could have ended up playing these excluded games;

1. Granti56 looked at the list at the time of play and chose to play games that were not allowed

2. Granti56 looked at an old list and selected the games previous to when they actually played

3. Granti56 did not look at the list of allowed games

Going through these options one at a time;

1. I can see no logical reason that any player would specifically choose to ignore the allowed list – it would create a guaranteed lose situations.

2. I find the idea that Granti56 read the list previous to the change and select their games at a point in time prior to actually playing very unlikely, but even if this was the case out of 88 games on the allowed list, 4 were removed – for Granti56 to have selected all 4 that were removed would be mathematically expressed as such;

4/88 x 3/87 x 2/86 x 1/85 = 1 in 2331891

Simply put there is only a 1 in 2331891 chance that Granti56 randomly selected all 4 games removed from the list of 88.

3. Granti56 did not look at the list of allowed games. This is far from unlikely, many players fail to properly read the terms and conditions when playing with a bonus. However a similar but reversed problem occurs with this solution. Assuming that we only look at the ‘Slots’ and ‘Other’ game categories, there are 95 games, only 4 of which were moved from the allowed to the disallowed categories. Repeating the sum above;

4/95 x 3/94 x 2/93 x 1/91 = 1 in 3183545

In other words, if Granti56 did not look at the list of allowed games, there’s even less chance of them selecting the 4 games that were removed.

Given that regardless of how Granti56 selected the games it is highly unlikely that they selected the same four at that Moore Games decided to remove, we now have to consider the other possibility; that Moore Games removed four games from the allowed list after a player had a substantial win playing them and in an effort to justify not paying the player. In this scenario there is clear motive, that being not having to pay out €24k, and as the games are specifically identified after the event, no mathematically unlikely coincidences.

However there is one further factor to consider; the one piece of information that we managed to get out of Moore Games before they stopped communicating is that they removed these games due to Return to Player bandings - in other words these games were considered by Moore Games to be too cheap for the player to play. Is it possible that Granti56 having looked at the list of allowed games before the change and selected the 4 lowest house edge/highest RTP games from the list, went back a few days later and coincidentally Moore Games had removed those games for exactly that reason? In short no.

This site’s slot review section provides extensive information on the RTPs of many slots games, including many of the Microgaming slots games that Moore Games offer. Below are the house edge figures for the four removed games (the highlighted entries have been independently verified by a source we can’t name);

Hitman 3.7-4.52%
Thunderstruck 3.9-4%
Secret Admirer 3.92%
Tomb Raider 4-4.45%

Even if we assume that the lowest house edge figure in the above list is correct, then if Moore Games are claiming that they removed games based on RTP banding, anything less that 3.7% should have been removed from the allowed games. Below are the games that remain on the Moore games list that contradict this (the highlighted entries have been independently verified by a source we can’t name);

Cops and Robbers 3%
5 Reel Drive 3.05%
Reel Thunder 3.05%
Carnaval 3.06%
Thunderstruck 2 3.35%
Age of Discovery 3.38%
Bush Telegraph 3.44%
Joker 8000 3.5%
Hellboy 3.51%

All of these games fall substantially beneath the 3.7% that is the lowest figure on the removed list. Basically, the figures that we’ve seen and had confirmed for us do not support the four removed games having been removed because they were too generous to the player, leaving us with only one remaining conclusion – these games were removed after a sizable win to justify not paying the win.

I can’t prove unequivocally that this is the case – I would need to have seen the list on the 17th of April to do that - but the evidence very strongly indicates that it is and as such we will be blacklisting Moore Games effective immediately.

Further supporting this are two highly worrying factors. The first of these occurred when we later checked to see the Google cache again for the specific promotion page, the page we saw was dated the 28th of March. The Google cache is a screenshot of the last time that Google looked at that page. The first time we looked at the Google cache for that page it was dated 13th of April, how if Google looked at the page on the 13th of April did it then revert to saying it hadn’t looked at the page since the 28th of March?

There are two possible explanations for this. Firstly Google uses a large number of servers, it’s possible that not all servers had been updated to the latest file. Given that I was checking from the same geographic location, it seems unlikely that I’d get another server, but as a check I had friends in 3 other distant locations check to see what they saw and all three confirmed the 28th of March as the date displayed. It seems unlikely then that this was an issue with the servers. The second possible explanation for this is that Moore Games made a request to Google that they remove the last cache page they had logged – this is a service that Google offer website owners for several reasons and is easily accessed. This is by far the weakest piece of evidence in this case, but worrying none-the-less given all of the above.

The second – and far more serious – issue that came to light was that as of two days ago (the 12th of May 2013) Moore Games Curacao EGaming license has been revoked and is now listed at ‘Invalid’.

Curacao have never been the strongest of online gaming regulators, for them to revoke a license is highly suggestive that Moore Games have failed to pay their license fees and are likely in substantial financial trouble. Again, this is simply my opinion based on the facts at hand, but I’m confident that readers will agree that financial troubles would certainly account for a casino looking for a reason not to pay a winner.

At the end of the day, this mediation has been a complete failure. While we appear to have vindicated the player’s claims, Moore Games have not paid the money they owe the player and as such while this may serve as a warning to other players, we’ve failed in our purpose. We have accounted for this in their casino reviews.

As a result of this case, we have set in place a system to monitor the terms and conditions of all the best online casinos and new casinos that we list on the site. This system will check both the General terms and the Promotional terms (where possible) at least once a day and we will be posting reports on any substantial changes to our message boards. The intention of this is to ensure that rule are not changed after the fact to justify seizure of winnings.

To Granti56 – I’m sorry we could not have been of more help in retrieving winnings that appear to be rightly yours.

May 15, 2013

First of all thank you very much for your help.
My real problem is how can I take my winnings ( Moore games have not even send me my deposit back to my account )
Do you have any suggestions about what path I have to follow now to take my winnings. For example: Should I made a complaint to Casinomeister to?

Thanks again for your time and your cooperation.

May 15, 2013

Hi Granti56,

Your options for recovery are limited at this point. In your position I'd be inclined to speak with all the dispute mediation services - CasinoMeister, Ask Gamblers and Gambling Grumbles - to ensure that there is maximum exposure for the issue. However, I'm already aware of at least 2 other sites that are covering this issue now due to this report, so I would doubt that they'll pay out to avoid further negative attention.

The other normal course would be to contact their regulator, however as Curacao has suspended Moore Games license I doubt they'll be willing to discuss your case.

The only other option is to try and pursue them through legal channels, but that would be very very difficult to do due to the international nature of this case and I personally have no experience of trying this so could offer no advice.

I will add that not even returning your deposit is further evidence to support you claim and makes it seem even more likely that this group simply don't have the money to pay their winners. No reputable casino would hold on to a deposit even if you had played restricted games.

I genuinely wish I could be of further assistance with this issue and I'm sorry that I can't.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland sits to the north-west of mainland Europe. The United Kingdom shares a border with The Republic of Ireland and has coasts on the Atlantic Ocean, Celtic Sea, North Sea, Irish Sea and English Channel. The population of the UK is approaching the 67.6 million mark leading to a fairly densely populated land mass. The gambling sector in the United Kingdom is entirely regulated and licensed by the UKGC – the United Kingdom Gambling Commission. Should players resident In the UK wish to gamble with foreign based operators there is no history of this being treated as a criminal offence, but high levels of protection exist for UK residents playing with UK licensed operators.


The above information is what we believe to be the the legal status of online gambling, however information on this topic is limited and hard to find. We accept no liability for any errors or ommissions. It is the reader’s responsibility to ensure that they know the legality of online gambling in their country before engaging with any online gambling service.