Android Phone

iPad

iPhone

Windows

Euro

Canadian Dollar

US Dollar

3 Oaks Gaming

Amatic

Amigo Gaming

Bally Wulff

Barbara Bang

Belatra Games

Bet2Tech

Betsoft

BF Games

BGAMING

Booming Games

Chilli Games

Endorphina

EURASIAN Gaming

Evoplay Entertainment

Felix Gaming

Five Men Gaming

FUGASO

GameArt

Gamebeat

Gaming Corps

Gamzix

Habanero

Igrosoft

Jetplay

KA Gaming

Mancala Gaming

Manna Play

Mascot Gaming

Merkur

Mplay Games

NetGame

Nucleus Gaming

Octoplay

OneTouch

Onlyplay

Platipus

PlayBro

Playson

Pocket Games Soft

Red Rake Gaming

Ruby Play

Slotmill

SpadeGaming

Spinmatic

Spinomenal

Spribe

Swintt

Thunderkick

Tom Horn Gaming

Turbo Games

VibraGaming

Wazdan

WorldMatch

Zeus Play

Zillion Games

Blackjack

Roulette

Curacao

Twin Casino

PurplePay

Master Card

Skrill

Neteller

MiFinity

Binance Pay

BUSD

Astropay

Pay4Fun

PicPay

Much Better

CashtoCode

Bank Transfer

Neosurf

Interac

Payinpay

Chat

Contact Form

Hi gstprimo - welcome to ThePOGG.com!

I'll contact the operator and see what we can find out for you.

Thanks,

ThePOGG

Twin has been top notch and professional. My vip account manager has advised me that they have decided to rectify the issue and credit my account the amount in dispute. This complaint can be completely withdrawn.

Hi gstprimo,

Thanks for letting us know - it is appreciated!

ThePOGG

apparently your confirmation to the casino is needed to rectify the issue. They have held off on payment for almost a week now. Can you by any chance take care of that?

Twin Casino have informed us that they contacted the submitting complainant and resolved this issue directly with them.


 
 Twin have generally been very accommodating and I consider them a premium operator. Payouts are completed without a hitch and done so expediently.
 
 Which is why I find it difficult to digest that they would allow me to seek assistance from a third party in regards to such a relatively minor some when gauged against my deposits. The dispute involves their loyalty scheme. I am a vip user with this operator. I accumulate cashback on net losses at a weekly rate of 10 percent. On Monday Nov 25 I deposited couple hundred into my account 800. After losing this amount I decided to take a break for 30 days. On the limits page there is the option to a) take a break, which I can enable on my own from the menu, and b) there is the option to self exclude, which requires the customer to contact support to initiate. The loyalty scheme that is subject to this dispute specifically excludes from participation accounts which are either excluded by the operator or are self excluded. Twin is not willing to credit cashback based on this rule.
 
 The issue with their logic is that should I take a 24 hour break today (thursday) until tomorrow, then this upcoming Monday my account will still receive cashback on net losses accrued on monday tuesday wednesday, thursday, saturday and sunday, and be credited to my account without issue on the upcoming monday. I have received my cashback for prior instances where I took a 24 hour timeout to allow processing of withdrawals. So I find arbitrary that if a 24 hour break is allowed to accumulate cash back, then why is a 30 day break not? After all, this is not a self exclusion, which is identified as a separate and distinct control from one of taking a break. Furthermore, no where in the terms and conditions for the loyalty scheme is it stated that an account on a break or time out does not qualify. Accordingly, I believe the time out break that i took were correctly not considered and included in the terms and conditions for when the loyalty scheme provisions were drafted and published, which do expressly identify self excluded and operator excluded accounts as being not eligible to accumulate rewards from the loyalty scheme. Also, the mere fact they are individual and distinct options of actions in the gaming limits page would suggest that taking a break does not constitute a self exclusion because if this were the case then the option of time out would not be available alongside the option to self exclude and instead there would simply be one option to self exclude with different periods of time available to do so. After compounding all these factors, the there is a clear indication that taking a break is not excluded from participating in the loyalty scheme.
 
 In any event the net losses were not accumulated during the time out period. They were in fact accumulated before the period commenced. They are not a bonus in terms of bonus funds for purposes of loyalty scheme as it is directly credited to the cash balance and not the bonus balance. So ultimately, cashback cannot be a bonus because it lacks conditions and so it is exactly that, cash that is being returned to the player and ultimately forms a part of the cash balance. The reactivation of account was not.predicated on the bonus because I have since reactivating my account made deposits with this operator. Multiple deposits in fact.
 
 For the record Twin has been professional with myself throughout my time with them. I have deposited quite frequently there and have usually been treated well. this is not to malign their brand or otherwise in an attempt to extract a few dollars. I truly believe there is a lack of direction and information on this aspect of their loyalty scheme and it is being used to their advantage. There is no clear terms and conditions surrounding this. If I had known they would try and do this i would of simply not took a time out. The amount in dispute is not significant and I'm sure they will make the correct decision. But for the time being they are not willing to listen to my position and reconsider their decision on this matter.
 
 
 

Twin - Arbitrary

To submit an online gambling complaint, register a new account or log in.

Create account

Log in

Got a complaint about a gambling site?

Casino Review Site Logo

Log out

Account

Title

Complaint Details

Posted By

Disputed amount

Date raised

Date closed

Player’s Complaint

To protect the privacy of our users, all personally identifiable information has been redacted. If you see anything we've missed contact us at complaints@casinoreviews.com.

Player's Complaint

Player Complaint Responses

Complaint Title

This complaint may have been archived. If you are looking for information about your complaint, please contact us at complaints@casinoreviews.com

This link is no longer valid

Dynamic Single Complaint 

Default

IGT DE

All British Casino UK

Playtech ZA

Bank Transfer CA

Online Casinos UK

Cookie Policy DE

PayPal

Neteller UK

Spin Casino

ecoPayz IE

King Billy Casino CA

Free Spins IN

Casinos en vivo PE

Terms of Use DE

Mirax Casino CA

Oasis Poker

Hellspin Casino NZ

Roulette ZA

Rizk Casino IE

Bonos de Casino

ecoPayz UK

Live Casinos AT

IGT NZ

Yabby Casino IE

Casinos Online CL

Condiciones de uso MX

Dave Ellefson - Founding member of Megadeth

African Grand ZA

GrandWin Casino

Mirax 

Bank Transfer ZA

Guts Casino CA

Ken Smith Blackjack Tournament Expert

Diamond7 Casino 

Casino Games IN

Visa CA

bCasino.co.uk – A UK licensed operator with ties to the black market?

New Casinos IN

21Prive Casino

Queen Vegas NZ

All Complaints

Visa ZA

King Billy Casino

Skrill CA

PayPal NZ

500 Deposit NZ

32Red Casino

Paysafecard DE

Responsible Gambling IN

Casino War

21Red Casino

Game Providers UK

Qbet Casino

ecoPayz CH

Quickfire

Zahlungsmethoden CH

Ruleta CO

Betway Casino NZ

888 Casino

PayPal IE

Arctic Casino NZ

JackpotCity Casino Ontario

Responsible Gambling UK

Aristocrat

Microgaming DE

888 Casino CA

Grosvenor Casino

100 Deposit NZ

Online Casinos IE

Mirax NZ

Starda Casino IN

Casumo Casino Ontario

Bank Transfer IN

Wazamba Casino CA

Betsson CO

Baccarat CA

Vegas Crest NZ

Red Stag Casino IE

Live Casinos NZ

Casumo Casino NZ

KingdomAce Casino

Mobile Casinos

CasinoLuck

Dinero real

Blackjack MX

Playtech DE